Platform / CRISPR Payload

CRISPR Cargo Formulation

Not all CRISPR payloads are the same. Cas9 RNP, mRNA + sgRNA co-encapsulation, base editors, and prime editors each impose different formulation requirements. Biopathio's platform is characterized across all four cargo types in CNS cell models.

Cargo Type Overview

The CRISPR toolbox has expanded well beyond the original Cas9 + sgRNA paradigm. Each payload type presents distinct physicochemical challenges for LNP encapsulation:

Cas9 RNP (Ribonucleoprotein)

Pre-formed Cas9:sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex. Advantages: no in-cell transcription required, reduced off-target activity due to transient expression. Challenges: RNP is a protein-nucleic acid complex (~160 kDa), requires gentle encapsulation at physiological pH. Biopathio's protocol uses low-voltage lipid exchange (LVLE) at pH 7.2 to maintain RNP integrity during encapsulation. Encapsulation efficiency for RNP is lower than nucleic acid-only cargo (see table below) but sufficient for in vitro CNS cell editing.

mRNA + sgRNA Dual-Cargo

Co-encapsulation of Cas9 mRNA and single guide RNA. This is the primary cargo type for in vivo delivery, as mRNA is more stable than RNP in systemic circulation. Challenge: mRNA and sgRNA have different charge densities and optimal encapsulation conditions. Sequential loading or co-encapsulation with adjusted N/P ratio (4–6) achieves adequate EE for both components. pKa 6.0–6.2 is optimal for dual-cargo endosomal escape.

Base Editors (ABE, CBE)

Base editor mRNAs are 4.5–5.5 kb in length — significantly larger than Cas9 mRNA (4.5 kb) alone, and substantially larger when the deaminase fusion is added (~5.5 kb for ABE8e). This requires adjusted lipid:RNA mass ratios and may benefit from lower PEG-lipid density to accommodate larger nucleic acid payload. Biopathio has achieved satisfactory EE for ABE8e mRNA + sgRNA formulation with ionizable lipid titration.

Prime Editors (PE2, PE3)

Prime editing requires co-delivery of PE2/PE3 mRNA and pegRNA (prime editing guide RNA). This is the most demanding dual-cargo format: pegRNA is larger than a standard sgRNA (~120 nt vs ~100 nt), and PE mRNA is > 6 kb. Active development area in Biopathio's formulation pipeline.

Comparison Table: Cargo × Encapsulation × Editing Efficiency

In vitro editing efficiency data from primary cortical neurons (DIV7–10) and SH-SY5Y differentiated neuron-like cells. All values are synthetic but plausible preclinical benchmarks.

Cargo Type Encapsulation Efficiency In Vitro Editing Efficiency (SH-SY5Y) In Vitro Editing Efficiency (Primary Neurons) Development Status
Cas9 RNP 41 ± 7 % 28 ± 5 % 18 ± 4 % Validated
mRNA + sgRNA (Cas9) 76 ± 4 % 52 ± 6 % 34 ± 7 % Validated
ABE8e mRNA + sgRNA 68 ± 5 % 44 ± 8 % 29 ± 6 % Validated
CBE4max mRNA + sgRNA 65 ± 6 % 38 ± 9 % 24 ± 5 % Validated
PE2 + pegRNA 51 ± 9 % 21 ± 7 % In progress Active development
Important context
In vitro editing efficiency in cell lines (SH-SY5Y) is consistently higher than in primary neurons. Primary neuron editing at 18–34% range is consistent with reported literature values for non-viral delivery in post-mitotic cells. These are preclinical in vitro benchmarks; in vivo CNS editing efficiency will depend on delivery efficiency to target cells and nuclease activity in that cellular context.

Have a CRISPR payload that needs CNS delivery?

We can discuss your specific cargo requirements and run a formulation feasibility assessment.

Schedule a Discussion